[gmpi] Re: Topic 4: Host Interface

From: Frederic Vanmol <frederic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 12:45:36 +0100

> > This is not going to be something a lot of hosts will ever implement, if
> > you ask me.
>
> Why? It's not that different to SMPTE / midiclock and other widely
> supported sync protocols that most pro-standard hosts are capable of
> slaving to.
>

It just seems to me that hosts don't like giving up control to a plugin. It 
might be different in the future, of course.

Frederic

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own
words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.

Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe

Follow-Ups:

[gmpi] Re: Topic 4: Host Interface
From: Angus F. Hewlett

[gmpi] Re: Topic 4: Host Interface
From: Steve Harris

References:
- [gmpi] Re: Topic 4: Host Interface
  - From: Angus F. Hewlett

[gmpi] Re: Topic 4: Host Interface

Other related posts: