[gmpi] Re: Reqs 3.8

--- Tim Hockin wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 12:36:07AM +0000, Steve Harris wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 12:28:59PM -0800, Tim Hockin wrote:
> > > 2) some plugins prefer integer IO.  Specifically TDM.  Do we want to
> > > make accords for them?  Will they ever USE GMPI?  Does it benefit 
> > > anyone else?  I don't see Digi switching.  I don't know if it 
> > > benefits anyone else.  I DO know that implementing the
infrastructure 
> > > I desribed (or something like it) allows us to add double support or

> > > any other IO type we want (FFT?)
> > 
> > Not really, FFT, like fixedpoint has many, many parameters, eg. power,
> > width, overlap, window shape, data format...
> > 
> > You could do soemthing like I described for non-native processing, but
> > the chances of the receiver being compatible with your choice of
> > parameters is slim.
> 
> Well, we COULD do FFTW IO.  (outside GMPI) Define an FFTW buffer format
> for inter-plug IO.


That would be sweeeeeeeeet...

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing.
http://photos.yahoo.com/

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own
words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.

Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe

Other related posts: