[gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- From: "Vincent Burel" <vincent.burel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 18:44:15 +0200
----- Original Message -----
From: <RonKuper@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 4:46 PM
Subject: [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
> >>>
> not for that, sorry, but In parallel again, i'm volunteer do write the
> source code of the minimal kernel SDK (pure "C" , simple, well commented,
> and homogenous). this very first SDK will be able to recieve any further
> requierment, and will highlight some critical point where we will have to
> find solution. After this very first step, then everybody could
participate
> in the same way than the requirements document....
> <<<
>
> I don't think it's a good idea to write code yet. There are countless
ways
> you can engrain design decisions into the code that would hopelesssly ruin
> it if anything needs to change. Even something as simple as a choice
> between "buffers" and "baton passing" (debated furiously here), has a
> profound impact on the final code.
>
> Not that this should necessarily stop you. It simply means we'll have yet
> another SDK to compare along with all the others. Maybe we'll say, "let's
> do X that way Vincent did it, and Y the way DirectX does it." I
definitely
> wouldn't expect any one person to write an SDK and have the group adopt it
> just like that.
Well, of course i will be necessary stoped at a moment or another. But the
very first step will be a kind of empty SDK with minimum feature. The big
deal is more to define Source Code organization, software interface
management, and other small things that allow us to go directly on the real
subject after. And i think i have the experience for that.
Also, i can design the things in order to let most of the choices openned
and changeable. I don't want to make an other VB-SDK (i already own many
private ones :-) i just want to bring the GMPI group on the first step
concerning the source code, because i'm still convinced that we have to
manage a source project in the same time we talk about requierement or
technical problems...
Vincent Burel
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
- References:
- [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- From: RonKuper
Other related posts:
- » [gmpi] Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- From: RonKuper