[gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- From: Marc Poirier <fipnid@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 10:10:36 -0700 (PDT)
--- "Angus F. Hewlett" wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Marc Poirier wrote:
>
> > With respect to Angus' comments about VST, well, I'm not really sure
> > what you're proposing. Using VST as a basis is not an option,
> > Steinberg has already clearly stated that.
>
> Absolutely. But following the basic, brute-simple design concept is one
> of the many paths GMPI can take.
Okay, thanks, I gotcha now.
> > I think that developers maybe get used to VST and its shortcomings and
> > stop thinking about them so much, but I certainly do think that
> > customers want them addressed. For years, I have gotten emails
> > regularly (every few days) either complaining about something or
> > reporting a "bug" with various plugins that I've worked on, problems
> > that all result from some shortcomings in VST, ones that are addressed
> > by some other APIs.
>
> OK, then you should definitely submit a review of VST, because I
> honestly have not seen those flaws. Like I say there are annoyances that
> should be fixed, but by and large it's a case of functionality that's
> implemented in an annoying or clumsy way rather than "vital" things that
> aren't there at all.
I'm not sure why "vital" is there or in quotes (I didn't say it), I'm not
talking about stuff that serious (although I guess it's up to
interpretation how serious "vital" is), but anyway, okay, I'll do a review
of VST, too.
> YES, it does take a 500-1,000 line class to encapsulate VST nicely for a
> host, but it only has to be written once and a "VST-like" GMPI standard
> could provide that.
I really would like to see a host SDK thing like that with GMPI. Although
not something to worry about now... ;)
> Anyway, I'll save the rest for my review... Marc, perhaps you could mail
> me on or off list with your view of VST's worst shortcomings, I'd like
> to analyse that as part of my review.
I'll just do my own bit of review, eventually, so I need not hold yours
up... :)
So is there any agreement on this change in the working process? I don't
want to start on any reviews if we're not actually going to take this new
direction...
Marc
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
- Follow-Ups:
- [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- From: Paul Davis
- References:
- [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- From: Angus F. Hewlett
Other related posts:
- » [gmpi] Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- From: Paul Davis
- [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- From: Angus F. Hewlett