[gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- From: "Vincent Burel" <vincent.burel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 22:25:49 +0200
----- Original Message -----
From: "Angus F. Hewlett" <amulet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 8:52 PM
Subject: [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
> On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Vincent Burel wrote:
>
> > > I disagree. Commenting on existing SDKs will allow us a good overview
of
> > > their REAL shortcomings, rather than their lack of corner-case and
> > > cloud-cuckoo-land functionality. The undisputable fact is that even
the
> > > SDK that is regarded as one of the most flawed and primitive - VST -
is
> > > able to deliver 85% of what both vendor and customer want 85% of the
time;
>
> > on wich planet ! ? :-)
>
> Seriously. Ignoring stability problems due largely to spec incompleteness,
> and non-technical issues (piracy-related market problems) what is VST
> unable to deliver THAT HOST VENDORS AND CUSTOMERS REALLY WANT?
I don't know if you can ignore all the things around VST SDK's .
> And if those problems are so bad, why are probably >85% of DAW plugins
> today written natively as VST or something similar, and most that are not
> are done that way for marketing reasons (high end plugs existing only as
> RTAS or TDM).
yes ! because this brings money and everybody know that a technology wich
brings money will stay alive longer than an other one which brings no money.
> There are a few things that suck about it, sure... things it is really
> unable to deliver to customers that we can reasonably forsee that
> customers will want (top of the list would be a dreadful implementation of
> surround, and a total absence of support for internationalization). But
> that kind of thing is easily fixable.
Let's do that ! (Steinberg will certainely be happy to get this correction
for free ! :-)
Vincent Burel
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
- Follow-Ups:
- [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- From: Angus F. Hewlett
- References:
- [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- From: Angus F. Hewlett
Other related posts:
- » [gmpi] Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- » [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- From: Angus F. Hewlett
- [gmpi] Re: Out-of-Band: suggestion for rethink
- From: Angus F. Hewlett