[gmpi] Re: [OT] listening tests (Was: Where are we?: 7.1.2/Untangling issues)
- From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 20:42:40 +0100
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 10:41:35AM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> >structure and in listening tests that has a real impact on the sound (the 64
> >bit implementation is smoother and other weird subjective kind of words). So
>
> do you use double-blind testing techniques for your listening tests? i
> have almost never seen them used by the audio industry, which instead
> seems to prefer so-called "A/B comparisons". no other testing domains
I dont think AB comparison precludes double-blind, the classic audio
quality testing software, ABX, is double-blind. Though, you're right, often
AB isn't double-blind.
- Steve
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
- References:
- [gmpi] Re: Where are we?: 7.1.2/Untangling issues
- From: B.J. Buchalter
- [gmpi] [OT] listening tests (Was: Where are we?: 7.1.2/Untangling issues)
- From: Paul Davis
Other related posts:
- » [gmpi] [OT] listening tests (Was: Where are we?: 7.1.2/Untangling issues)
- » [gmpi] Re: [OT] listening tests (Was: Where are we?: 7.1.2/Untangling issues)
- » [gmpi] Re: [OT] listening tests (Was: Where are we?: 7.1.2/Untangling issues)
- [gmpi] Re: Where are we?: 7.1.2/Untangling issues
- From: B.J. Buchalter
- [gmpi] [OT] listening tests (Was: Where are we?: 7.1.2/Untangling issues)
- From: Paul Davis