[gmpi] Re: [OT] Missing in (in)action?

On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 RonKuper@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> > I'm really sorry if anyone is offended by my style.
>
> No offense taken here.
>
> I'm hoping the slow activity on the list today isn't because people feel
> discouraged by Steinberg's position regarding GMPI.

No, it's just nobody wants to be the first to pick up the flamethrower :)

> I don't believe the long term success of GMPI is suddenly jeapordized by this 
> new bit of
> information.  It seem to me that the design effort for GMPI thus far has
> been proceeding at a great pace without technical input from some "big
> players" such as Steinberg, Apple, Microsoft, Digidesign, etc.

Agreed. Actually, I'd be interested to hear the Microsoft
representatives' position on this. Doesn't seem like they're doing
anything a.t.m. that's directly threatened by GMPI.

Regards,
        Angus.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own
words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.

Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe

Other related posts: