[gmpi] Re: [OT] Missing in (in)action?

From: Bram - Smartelectronix <bram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 22:45:03 +0100 (CET)

On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Marc Poirier wrote:
>
> > Steinberg thinks VST(i) is standard and wants to keep it that way.
> > Emagic thinks Audio Units is, and Apple wants to keep it that way.
> 
> True about Steinberg/VST, but when have Apple or Emagic ever said this 
> sort of thing?

Hey guys -hey marc-

I'm really sorry if anyone is offended by my style.... It wasn't my 
intention to stir up things. If anyone is offended, please accept my 
apologies...

greetings,

 - bram


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own
words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.

Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe

References:

[gmpi] Re: [OT] Missing in (in)action?
From: Marc Poirier

[gmpi] Re: [OT] Missing in (in)action?

Other related posts: