[gmpi] Re: NAMM follow-up, some major decisions to make

I would gladly do the same for DXi.  Anyone want to do AU?

Too bad RTAS and HTDM require a license.<g>

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jeff McClintock" <jeffmcc@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2005 6:20 PM
Subject: [gmpi] Re: NAMM follow-up, some major decisions to make


> Cheers Ron,
>
> That sounds positive, I (perhaps wrongly) got the impression some MMA
> members were anti-GMPI and might interfere.
>
> I will join the MMA if necessary to get GMPI off the ground.
>    I'm very hopefull we can wrap this up a lot faster than the 2 years
> it's taken so far.
>
>    For example I've already got complete, working, stable VST hosting
> code I'm happy to donate to the VST-GMPI wrapper.
>
>    I'm really keen on writting a 'burnt-in' wrapper, i.e. You can
> (optionally) include VST-wrapper source code at compile-time, a single
> dll file can then simultaneously support both the GMPI and VST
> interface.  kind of a "universal plugin".  If someone does the same for
> DXi, we will have a real "killer-app".  Write once, run anywhere.
>
> Jeff
>
> Ron Kuper wrote:
> > I wouldn't say the large manufacturers have nothing to gain.  There are
> > large manufacterers who are interested.  And even though objections were
> > raised at the meeting last week, the objections aren't insurmountable,
and
> > nor were the opinions the "official corporate" position(s) of the
companies
> > involved.
> >
> > I am confident that we will be able to find a way to make GMPI more
> > attractive, both by highlighting key tech and market benefits, and also
> > perhaps by tweaking our development process to recognize the MMA more
> > clearly.
> >
> > If it came to a vote in the MMA, every member's vote counts equally,
AFAIK.
> > If, as I hope, ~12 software companies decide to join the MMA to persue
this
> > effort, it would be a significant reshaping of the organization.
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Jeff McClintock" <jeffmcc@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2005 4:38 PM
> > Subject: [gmpi] Re: NAMM follow-up, some major decisions to make
> >
> >
> >
> >>I feel there's something of a divide between the small independent
> >>software developers ( who have the most to gain from GMPI ), and the
> >>large manufactures represented by the MMA ( who have nothing to gain ).
> >>
> >>What If I did join the MMA, worked hard on GMPI, then the MMA held a
> >>vote to either endorse GMPI, or kill it.  How does my vote stack up
> >>against Yamaha's?
> >>
> >>Jeff
> >>
> >>
> >>----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
> >>Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
> >>following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your
own
> >>words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
> >>redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
> >>
> >>Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
> >>Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
> > Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
> > following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your
own
> > words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
> > redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
> >
> > Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
> > Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
> >
> >
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
> Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
> following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own
> words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
> redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
>
> Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
> Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
>


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own
words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.

Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe

Other related posts: