[gmpi] Re: Moving on?
- From: Tim Hockin <thockin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2003 17:33:31 -0800
On Sun, Nov 23, 2003 at 09:54:46PM -0700, Mike Berry wrote:
> >GMPI must be primarily aimed at realtime processing systems, but must also
> >support offline processing.
>
> Small (nit-picking) detail: I don't know if we are getting this into
> "standards-speak" yet, but all of the "musts" need to changed to "shalls."
For requirements?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
- Follow-Ups:
- [gmpi] Re: Moving on?
- From: Mike Berry
- References:
- [gmpi] Re: Moving on?
- From: Michael Gogins
- [gmpi] Re: Moving on?
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: Moving on?
- From: Mike Berry
Other related posts:
- » [gmpi] Moving on?
- » [gmpi] Re: Moving on?
- » [gmpi] Re: Moving on?
- » [gmpi] Re: Moving on?
- » [gmpi] Re: Moving on?
- » [gmpi] Re: Moving on?
- [gmpi] Re: Moving on?
- From: Mike Berry
- [gmpi] Re: Moving on?
- From: Michael Gogins
- [gmpi] Re: Moving on?
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: Moving on?
- From: Mike Berry