[gmpi] Re: Moving on?

On Sun, Nov 23, 2003 at 08:52:53PM -0500, Michael Gogins wrote:
> With respect to 3.4, I strongly suggest that "support realtime
> performance" be changed to "primarily support real-time performance but
> also support off-line performance. Note endings shall be unambiguously
> linked with their proper note beginnings in such a way as to support
> multiple voices for the same instrument on the same pitch, attacking at
> the same or different instants and releasing at the same or different
> instants. In other words, GMPI shall fully support polyphony including
> polyphony of unisons."

I know you want to get stuff about note IDs in there, and they will be.  But
everything you wrote beyond "support off-line performance" is OT for now :)


I'll change #11 to read:

GMPI must be primarily aimed at realtime processing systems, but must also
support offline processing.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own
words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.

Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe

Other related posts: