[gmpi] Re: MIDI: Questioning semantics

On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 03:48:11 -0500, Jack O'Quin wrote:
> > I don't see that a protocol per se can ever guarantee non-interaction
> > of parameters within a plug, the best we can do is make a stern
> > recommendation to code up an Actor in those cases.
> 
> It doesn't even have to be all that stern.  If the automation feature
> is useful, users will want it.  So, the developers will end up writing
> that required Actor eventually.  :-)

There is a bootstrap probem; if none of the day 0 plugins support it then
the nosts wont either, and the users will never know to pester the
deveopers of the non-compliant plugins.

- Steve

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own
words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.

Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe

Other related posts: