[gmpi] Re: MIDI: Proposed Reqs (try #3)
- From: Chris Grigg <gmpi-public@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 11:44:31 -0700
Looks good to me, but how about changing the wording to "(though the
in-graph data may be implemented in any form: as MIDI, non-MIDI, or any
combination)"?
I think this is wandering away from the try #2 language, which was
better. That did two things: it said there must be only one delivery
mechanism, and it said that a non-MIDI coding is not unacceptable.
That was what the group decided. Try #3 is, so far, wandering away
from both forks in ways I don't understand, for reasons I can't make
out.
-- Chris G.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
- Follow-Ups:
- [gmpi] Re: MIDI: Proposed Reqs (try #3)
- From: Tim Hockin
- References:
- [gmpi] Re: MIDI: Proposed Reqs (try #3)
- From: gogins@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Other related posts:
- » [gmpi] MIDI: Proposed Reqs (try #3)
- » [gmpi] Re: MIDI: Proposed Reqs (try #3)
- » [gmpi] Re: MIDI: Proposed Reqs (try #3)
- » [gmpi] Re: MIDI: Proposed Reqs (try #3)
- » [gmpi] Re: MIDI: Proposed Reqs (try #3)
- » [gmpi] Re: MIDI: Proposed Reqs (try #3)
- » [gmpi] Re: MIDI: Proposed Reqs (try #3)
- » [gmpi] Re: MIDI: Proposed Reqs (try #3)
- » [gmpi] Re: MIDI: Proposed Reqs (try #3)
- » [gmpi] Re: MIDI: Proposed Reqs (try #3)
- » [gmpi] Re: MIDI: Proposed Reqs (try #3)
- » [gmpi] Re: MIDI: Proposed Reqs (try #3)
- » [gmpi] Re: MIDI: Proposed Reqs (try #3)
- » [gmpi] Re: MIDI: Proposed Reqs (try #3)
- » [gmpi] Re: MIDI: Proposed Reqs (try #3)
- » [gmpi] Re: MIDI: Proposed Reqs (try #3)
- » [gmpi] Re: MIDI: Proposed Reqs (try #3)
Looks good to me, but how about changing the wording to "(though the in-graph data may be implemented in any form: as MIDI, non-MIDI, or any combination)"?
- [gmpi] Re: MIDI: Proposed Reqs (try #3)
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: MIDI: Proposed Reqs (try #3)
- From: gogins@xxxxxxxxxxxx