[gmpi] Re: MIDI: Proposed Reqs (try #3)

On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 11:44:31AM -0700, Chris Grigg wrote:
> I think this is wandering away from the try #2 language, which was 
> better.  That did two things: it said there must be only one delivery 
> mechanism, and it said that a non-MIDI coding is not unacceptable. 

I don't believe that dictating only one delivery mechanism is a
requirement, as I have said before.  This deserves to be vague because
there are several potential implementations.

I think we're still clear on the "non-MIDI coding is not unacceptable"
part in try #3.

What other "wandering" do you see?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own
words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.

Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe

Other related posts: