[gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- From: Paul Davis <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:46:09 -0500
>Cheers Paul,
>
> > foo_is_a_singleton = new SomeObject();
>
>2nd question. Does GMPI therefore need a function..
>
> PreDllUnload()
>
>to support the destruction of such singletons?
thats a good question. obviously, the objects can't be destroyed in a
plugin destructor.
tough call. we could choose to rely on the existence of a standard
mechanism, and say nothing more about static objects, other than to
note that platforms must support them.
we might get more portability (slightly) if we did in fact have a
PreDLLUnload() method.
anybody else?
--p
ps. to stress again: the issue Tim was having was caused by a mismatch
between the mechanism his compiler was using and the one supported by
his C/C++ runtime environment. this sort of clash was anticipated by
the C++ standards committee, and I am not sure we are obliged to do
much about an issue that was "settled" almost 5 years ago.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
- Follow-Ups:
- [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- From: Tim Hockin
- References:
- [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- From: Jeff McClintock
Other related posts:
- » [gmpi] Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- » [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: Linux C++ question
- From: Jeff McClintock