[gmpi] Re: Instruments done, moving on to "Plugin Files"

Great thought, Steve (though I'm interested to hear if anyone (commercial devs?) disagrees). I'd like to see this rationale made explicit in the req's, perhaps by fleshing out #88. - Jim


At 10:08 AM +0100 8/27/04, Steve Harris wrote: 
Storing the metadata in a seperate part of the plugin means that we could
require it to be freely licenced, which would make the metadata of every
plugin free for use, even though the plugin itsself isnt eg. to include in
session files to make sessions more easily portable between machines. that
way the receiver can know exactly what plugins thier missing and make
substitutions as appropriate.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own
words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.

Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe

Other related posts: