[gmpi] Re: Decision time: 8.2

--- Chris Grigg wrote:
> Given all that, I'm unclear on why touch automation wouldn't be 
> purely a host issue.  IOW, how does any of this actually affect the 
> plug-in API?  Why does the plug need to care whether the events it 
> gets are coming from a touch update source? Like I said, maybe I'm 
> just missing something.

No, the plugin doesn't need to know if touch automation is currently
occuring or not, I don't think.  But, if it has enough information to know
that it should be reporting parameter changes in a way such that touch
automation will work, if it is currently happening, then the plugin should
be able to do this.

But regarding your general uncertainty about this topic, I don't really
know where to start.  I have already written an awful lot of messages
trying to explain the details about this, so I don't really want to start
over again, so maybe if I knew more specifically which parts you weren't
following, it would be easier to try to clarify some points.  Also, it's
apparently off-topic now, so maybe it's best to just drop it altogether...

Marc

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own
words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.

Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe

Other related posts: