[gmpi] Re: Decision Time: 8.3
- From: Tim Hockin <thockin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: GMPI list <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 13:37:43 -0700
On Sun, Sep 14, 2003 at 10:42:46AM +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 11:38:17 -0700, Tim Hockin wrote:
> > What of platforms that do not have FPUs?
>
> They still have libm, but I guess its an unnessary expense.
>
> Another alternative would be to make it that same format as a sample (ala
> LADSPA). Assuming we do go for a single sample format.
That's kinda what I was thinking.
I see a need for
float - many normal params
double - high res params
int - many normal params
enum - radio buttons, N-position knobs
bool - buttons
string - filenames, words
blob - misc
Now, float can be translated to be the same as sample_type. I'm not sure
how thinsg that require double-precision can be translated into non-FPU.
This whole non-FPU thing is a real pain in the ass.
<aside>
I want to make a motion that we NOT consider systems without FPUs, or that
we find some simpler way to handle it. Perhaps those non-FPU platforms
don't have to do FP audio IO, but _do_ need to do float/double parameters?
What is the real goal of non-FPU support? Where are it's backers? Whenever
someone says something that might make non-FPU systems hurt, no one speaks
up for them. Are we solving a problem that doesn't exit?
</aside>
Int parameters can be faked using float.
Enum and bool can be faked using int.
String and Blob are obvious, I think.
So that leaves my NEED list at float/real/sample_type + string + blob. Are
there good reasons to turn anything else into fundamental primitives?
Perhaps int - can anyone justify it?
--
Notice that as computers are becoming easier and easier to use,
suddenly there's a big market for "Dummies" books. Cause and effect,
or merely an ironic juxtaposition of unrelated facts?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
- Follow-Ups:
- [gmpi] Re: Decision Time: 8.3
- From: Chris Grigg
- References:
- [gmpi] Decision Time: 8.3
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: Decision Time: 8.3
- From: Steve Harris
- [gmpi] Re: Decision Time: 8.3
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: Decision Time: 8.3
- From: Steve Harris
Other related posts:
- » [gmpi] Decision Time: 8.3
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision Time: 8.3
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision Time: 8.3
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision Time: 8.3
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision Time: 8.3
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision Time: 8.3
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision Time: 8.3
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision Time: 8.3
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision Time: 8.3
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision Time: 8.3
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision Time: 8.3
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision Time: 8.3
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision Time: 8.3
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision Time: 8.3
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision Time: 8.3
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision Time: 8.3
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision Time: 8.3
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision Time: 8.3
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision Time: 8.3
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision Time: 8.3
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision Time: 8.3
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision Time: 8.3
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision Time: 8.3
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision Time: 8.3
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision Time: 8.3
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision Time: 8.3
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision Time: 8.3
- [gmpi] Re: Decision Time: 8.3
- From: Chris Grigg
- [gmpi] Decision Time: 8.3
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: Decision Time: 8.3
- From: Steve Harris
- [gmpi] Re: Decision Time: 8.3
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: Decision Time: 8.3
- From: Steve Harris