[gmpi] Re: DECISION: Decision making policy

On Tuesday 08 March 2005 09.24, Crudesoft wrote:
> > ACK, with one ammendment.  Late comments might not
> > be counted, but may be
> > considered if they raise a valid concern as
> > determined by the DECISION
> > proposer.
> 
> If they raise a valid concern then they can start a
> new DECISION round to undo or modify the previous one.

Yes. That has the advantage that things don't get stuck indefinitely, 
without an official decision, while the proposer keeps refusing to 
let the matter go. It's better to make a decision and change it 
later, if things don't work out as intended, than to never get around 
to making a decision at all.


So;
 original_version->votes++;


//David Olofson - Programmer, Composer, Open Source Advocate

.- Audiality -----------------------------------------------.
|  Free/Open Source audio engine for games and multimedia.  |
| MIDI, modular synthesis, real time effects, scripting,... |
`-----------------------------------> http://audiality.org -'
   --- http://olofson.net --- http://www.reologica.se ---

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own
words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.

Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe

Other related posts: