[gmpi] Re: ABI's / Nutshell
- From: Chris Grigg <gmpi-public@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:32:38 -0800
Since we are not using COM per se, what is the motivation for the
"Unknown" step? Is it that the factory going to be making
something other than plug instances?
Yep, GMPI_Plugin_GUI objects for one.
Shouldn't one of those come from the plug instance it's meant to
control, instead of the factory?
Is it for managing plug API version
changes?
Yep.
Couldn't the factory or the metadata provide that more simply?
-- Chris G.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
- Follow-Ups:
- [gmpi] Re: ABI's / Nutshell
- From: Jeff McClintock
- References:
- [gmpi] Re: ABI's
- From: jeffmcc
- [gmpi] Re: ABI's
- From: Chris Grigg
- [gmpi] Re: ABI's
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: ABI's / Nutshell
- From: Chris Grigg
- [gmpi] Re: ABI's / Nutshell
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: ABI's / Nutshell
- From: Chris Grigg
- [gmpi] Re: ABI's / Nutshell
- From: Jeff McClintock
Other related posts:
- » [gmpi] Re: ABI's / Nutshell
- » [gmpi] Re: ABI's / Nutshell
- » [gmpi] Re: ABI's / Nutshell
- » [gmpi] Re: ABI's / Nutshell
- » [gmpi] Re: ABI's / Nutshell
- » [gmpi] Re: ABI's / Nutshell
- » [gmpi] Re: ABI's / Nutshell
- » [gmpi] Re: ABI's / Nutshell
- » [gmpi] Re: ABI's / Nutshell
- » [gmpi] Re: ABI's / Nutshell
- » [gmpi] Re: ABI's / Nutshell
- » [gmpi] Re: ABI's / Nutshell
- » [gmpi] Re: ABI's / Nutshell
- » [gmpi] Re: ABI's / Nutshell
- » [gmpi] Re: ABI's / Nutshell
- » [gmpi] Re: ABI's / Nutshell
- » [gmpi] Re: ABI's / Nutshell
- » [gmpi] Re: ABI's / Nutshell
- » [gmpi] Re: ABI's / Nutshell
- » [gmpi] Re: ABI's / Nutshell
- » [gmpi] Re: ABI's / Nutshell
- » [gmpi] Re: ABI's / Nutshell
- » [gmpi] Re: ABI's / Nutshell
- » [gmpi] Re: ABI's / Nutshell
- » [gmpi] Re: ABI's / Nutshell
- » [gmpi] Re: ABI's / Nutshell
- » [gmpi] Re: ABI's / Nutshell
- » [gmpi] Re: ABI's / Nutshell
- » [gmpi] Re: ABI's / Nutshell
- » [gmpi] Re: ABI's / Nutshell
- » [gmpi] Re: ABI's / Nutshell
- » [gmpi] Re: ABI's / Nutshell
- » [gmpi] Re: ABI's / Nutshell
- » [gmpi] Re: ABI's / Nutshell
Since we are not using COM per se, what is the motivation for the "Unknown" step? Is it that the factory going to be making something other than plug instances?
Yep, GMPI_Plugin_GUI objects for one.
changes?
Yep.
Couldn't the factory or the metadata provide that more simply?
- [gmpi] Re: ABI's / Nutshell
- From: Jeff McClintock
- [gmpi] Re: ABI's
- From: jeffmcc
- [gmpi] Re: ABI's
- From: Chris Grigg
- [gmpi] Re: ABI's
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: ABI's / Nutshell
- From: Chris Grigg
- [gmpi] Re: ABI's / Nutshell
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: ABI's / Nutshell
- From: Chris Grigg
- [gmpi] Re: ABI's / Nutshell
- From: Jeff McClintock