[gmpi] Re: 3.18 Copy Protection
- From: "Ron Kuper" <RonKuper@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 18:25:09 -0400
>>>
combine this with the fact that its the host that will
have to tell the existing plugins about the new guy.
<<<
Plugins have access to the graph, right? So plugins can look for bad
guys themselves. There's a community-minded incentive for doing this:
if you do this, and your neighbor & competitor does this, and so on,
then you have a lot of redundancy that makes is stronger.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
- Follow-Ups:
- [gmpi] Re: 3.18 Copy Protection
- From: Paul Davis
Other related posts:
- » [gmpi] 3.18 Copy Protection
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.18 Copy Protection
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.18 Copy Protection
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.18 Copy Protection
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.18 Copy Protection
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.18 Copy Protection
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.18 Copy Protection
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.18 Copy Protection
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.18 Copy Protection
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.18 Copy Protection
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.18 Copy Protection
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.18 Copy Protection
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.18 Copy Protection
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.18 Copy Protection
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.18 Copy Protection
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.18 Copy Protection
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.18 Copy Protection
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.18 Copy Protection
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.18 Copy Protection
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.18 Copy Protection
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.18 Copy Protection
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.18 Copy Protection
- [gmpi] Re: 3.18 Copy Protection
- From: Paul Davis