[gmpi] Re: 3.18 Copy Protection

On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 06:23:19PM -0400, Ron Kuper wrote:
> >>>
> I mean, we *really* don't want to encourage plugs that are locked to
> hosts.
> <<<
> 
> But *we*, Cakewalk, require this.  Plugin vendors that we've worked with
> want to protect their reputation, they don't want their DSP crown jewels
> shared so easily.  They like the idea of locking their bundled plugin to
> the host with which it was bundled.

Bundled plugins are, fortunately, the short list.  Since they arethe
exception, maybe it's ok to make this "locking" be the exception, too?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own
words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.

Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe

Other related posts: