[gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- From: Chris Grigg <gmpi-public@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 16:51:00 -0700
On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 04:14:24PM -0700, Chris Grigg wrote:
The document should be clearer than it is about why control I/O is
needed when we've also got parameters. That is, the two should
concepts be more clearly distinguished. Actually, I'm not even clear
about this any more... previous discussion pointer, anyone?
I think the relationship is that parameters are what control IO controls?
Or, put otherwise. Control IO is the abstract name for events which
control parameters.
?
Love to clarify it..
So -- to stick with the existing terminology before we try to improve
it -- there are parameter-setting event messages flying around in the
graph, and they travel only on paths that terminate at control I/O
ports, and after arriving at a given plug's given control I/O port,
the messages get split out to parameter destinations based on the
(probably OSC-style) parameter ID tag? Is that the idea?
-- Chris G.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
- Follow-Ups:
- [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- From: Tim Hockin
- References:
- [gmpi] 3.12 Control I/O
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- From: Chris Grigg
- [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- From: Tim Hockin
Other related posts:
- » [gmpi] 3.12 Control I/O
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
The document should be clearer than it is about why control I/O is needed when we've also got parameters. That is, the two should concepts be more clearly distinguished. Actually, I'm not even clear about this any more... previous discussion pointer, anyone?
I think the relationship is that parameters are what control IO controls?
Or, put otherwise. Control IO is the abstract name for events which control parameters. ?
Love to clarify it..
- [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] 3.12 Control I/O
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- From: Chris Grigg
- [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- From: Tim Hockin