[gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- From: "Jeff McClintock" <jeffmcc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 09:48:54 +1200
> this is a common misconception. actually, VST has
> VstParameterProperties that allow for natural ranges, plus step sizes
> etc. however, nobody seem to know any hosts that use them.
Hi Paul,
*grin*, I think the misconception is that VST supports natural ranges. The
reality is, it doesn't.
It's a perfect example of putting a 'nice to have' feature in a standard,
then having no one support it.
I think everyone who proposes a feature for GMPI should be forced to use
that feature in their own product....... Don't worry, I'm only (half)
joking.
Best Regards,
Jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Davis" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 10:40 PM
Subject: [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
> >> If all controls were normalized... It makes this problem easier but
other
> >> things harder. We decided early on that we want the ability to have
> >> natural ranges. Do we want to change that?
> >
> >No, I agree with you.
> > VST specifies normalised ranges, that's OK for 90% of parameters, but
for
> >the remaining 10% it's a real pain.
>
> this is a common misconception. actually, VST has
> VstParameterProperties that allow for natural ranges, plus step sizes
> etc. however, nobody seem to know any hosts that use them except for
> one i wrote for linux :)
>
> --p
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
> Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
> following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
> words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
> redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
>
> Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
> Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
>
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
- Follow-Ups:
- [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- From: Steve Harris
- References:
- [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- From: Paul Davis
Other related posts:
- » [gmpi] 3.12 Control I/O
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- From: Steve Harris
- [gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- From: Paul Davis