[gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters

On Friday, April 30, 2004 1:05 AM [GMT+1=CET],
Jeff McClintock <xxxjeffmcc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Chris,
> 
>> But if the only part of OSC we're thinking of
>> using is the addressing notation, ... we're totally gutting OSC and any
>> actual interop with OSC is out the window
> 
> If the OSC naming convention is logical and suits us, use it.
> 
> GMPI dosn't have to *be* OSC, but compatible naming makes GMPI/OSC
> interaction easier, that's not "totally gutting OSC".

Yes, that were my thougts too when reading that ;-)
Koen



----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own
words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.

Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe

Other related posts: