[gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- From: Chris Grigg <gmpi-public@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 09:57:40 -0700
Jeff said:
I like the modules idea. Provided changes to the parameter list are not
automatable.
e.g. a modular mixer is cool, except you can't go automating the addition or
removal of entire channels.
Yeah. We should try to characterize when plug reconfig is legal vs.
when not. I would be tempted to say host is not required to keep
running the seq nor processing audio during a plug reconfig. Which
again implies the plug needs to ask host permission before doing a
reconfig, so the host can trap it (and then either handle it or not
according to current state vs. product design, user pref, etc.).
-- Chris G.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
- References:
- [gmpi] 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- From: Chris Grigg
- [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- From: David Olofson
- [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- From: Chris Grigg
- [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- From: Chris Grigg
- [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- From: Jeff McClintock
Other related posts:
- » [gmpi] 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
I like the modules idea. Provided changes to the parameter list are not automatable.
e.g. a modular mixer is cool, except you can't go automating the addition or removal of entire channels.
- [gmpi] 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- From: Chris Grigg
- [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- From: David Olofson
- [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- From: Chris Grigg
- [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- From: Chris Grigg
- [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- From: Jeff McClintock