[gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters

Thanks, Koen!

Hm, though the whole OSC addressing model is about methods, not parameters. If we're really serious about using OSC whole, it would make more sense to dump all the work we've already done on messaging and datatypes. And an API for that matter, since OSC accesses methods via message. But if the only part of OSC we're thinking of using is the addressing notation, which is only a small subset of the OSC design, and only using that for parameter addressing and not method addressing, then IMHO we're totally gutting OSC and any actual interop with OSC is out the window... so, in that scenario, there's no longer any real need to be slavish about using strings to address slots. We'd just be borrowing the idea, and there's no need to borrow more of the idea than what fits our actual need.

-- Chris G.

On Wednesday, April 28, 2004 7:14 PM [GMT+1=CET],
Chris Grigg <xxxgmpi-public@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

 So can you provide a pointer to the OSC parameter
 string format spec, for a closer look?

http://cnmat.cnmat.berkeley.edu/OpenSoundControl/

Koen 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own
words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.

Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe

Other related posts: