[gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- From: "Jeff McClintock" <jeffmcc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 15:29:16 +1200
> http://cnmat.cnmat.berkeley.edu/OpenSoundControl/
My initial impression is that OSC is ideal. It's all about parameter
naming. It's well thought out. It's shaping up to be the replacement for
MIDI.
I can see one obvious objection... Strings, parameters have URL-style names.
BUT. At Tim said, it's just a programming issue. While initialising the
plugin, map param-names to param-index, ...or pointers, or
whatever...(details don't matter). Use that shortcut for sending events
etc).
why re-invent the wheel? (we want to provide OSC compatibility anyhow)
what do yous think?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
- References:
- [gmpi] 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- From: Chris Grigg
- [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- From: David Olofson
- [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- From: Chris Grigg
- [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- From: Koen Tanghe
Other related posts:
- » [gmpi] 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- [gmpi] 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- From: Chris Grigg
- [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- From: David Olofson
- [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- From: Chris Grigg
- [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- From: Koen Tanghe