[gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Dynamic plugin structure

>Well now my mind is struggling to cope.  Does this mean that to record a
>performance, a sequencer must not only record parameter changes, but changes
>to parameter meta-data?
>
>e.g. Parameter X exists only for the chorus, then is deleted, later on it
>re-appears, but with a different data type?
>
>...and the host transport is able to jump to any point in the performance?
>When the transport is stopped, what UI does the plugin have?, the one from
>the chorus, or the one from the verse?
>
>This is sounding more and more flaky to me.  I'm starting to think that if a
>plugin changes it's interface, it's got to be treated like a new plugin.

what he said ...

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own
words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.

Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe

Other related posts: