[gmpi] Re: 3.11 Parameters (Req 52)
- From: Andy <andy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "'gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 08:59:43 +0100
"Req 52: All parameters are automatable. Parameter automation is simply
event playback."
Is the second part of this statement true ? What about the case of
automation that is "drawn" by the user with a small number of datapoints.
Surely in that case the host is interpolating between the points which is
not simply "event playback". Of course the GMPI plugin shouldn't care, it
should just act on the parameters it's getting.
Come to think of it is the first part of the statement true either ? What
about "hidden" (Req 49) parameters, presumably the host will have no way of
exposing them to automation ?
Andy
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
- Follow-Ups:
- [gmpi] Re: 3.11 Parameters (Req 52)
- From: Steve Harris
- [gmpi] Re: 3.11 Parameters (Req 52)
- From: Tim Hockin
Other related posts:
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.11 Parameters (Req 52)
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.11 Parameters (Req 52)
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.11 Parameters (Req 52)
- [gmpi] Re: 3.11 Parameters (Req 52)
- From: Steve Harris
- [gmpi] Re: 3.11 Parameters (Req 52)
- From: Tim Hockin