[gmpi] Re: 3.11 Parameters

On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 08:54:16 -0800, Tim Hockin wrote:
> > I dont think so - it sounds very compicated when you could just declare it
> > as N different plugins, which share common code. It places a lot of
> > complexity in the hosts instantiation code and plugins that use it. It
> > also looses oportunities for optimisation in the compiler, eg. fixed loop
> > unrolling if you use it.
> 
> I agree with all this as the flip-side.  I could be talked out of it ;)  We
> almost have to support dynamic I/O though.  Too many existing APIs do it to
> not handle it, I think.

Dynamic i/o connection, or dynamic i/o creation?

- Steve

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own
words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.

Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe

Other related posts: