[gmpi] Re: 3.11 Parameters

On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 10:08:42AM -0500, Ron Kuper wrote:
> >>>
> Being picky, I dont believe parity with a (small) subset of existing
> standards is a use case, though your modular synth one is.
> <<<
> 
> True, it's not a use case.  But partity with existing standards is a
> requirement.  If GMPI is functionally a step backwards from existing
> commercially successful standards, it won't succeed.

True, but as a counter-example there are several plugin systems that don't
allow port addition/removal and are certainly commercially successful.
AFAIK neither VST or TDM allow parameter creation/destruction during
runtime.

- Steve

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own
words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.

Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe

Other related posts: