[gmpi] Re: 3.10 wrap up (try #1)

Personally I disagree strongly that we're not smart enough to find a non-complicated way to handle encoding hints, and that GMPI will be a practically viable format for non-trivial encodings if we don't support hints. The outcome of the previous long long discussion on this was, IIRC, that we .did. need hints.

Also, for the milliionth time, the absence of disagreement is not evidence of agreement, some of us have had life events and major conferences to deal with recently.

-- C

Stick a fork in it, it's done.  (Cooked many months ago, as you pointed
out.)

-----Original Message-----
From: gmpi-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gmpi-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Tim Hockin
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 8:44 PM
To: GMPI list
Subject: [gmpi] 3.10 wrap up (try #1)

I've committed all th enotes from 3.10 discussions and 3.10 seems to be
dead, now.

http://www.gmpi-plugins.org/gmpi/requirements.php

I everyone content with 3.10?  If so, we can close it and move to the
next big fun one.  Having discussed auido IO to death previously, this
was a record time for a topic!!  More of that, please!

Tim 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own
words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.

Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe

Other related posts: