[gmpi] Re: 3.10 (req. 39)
- From: Andy <andy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "'gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 14:21:01 -0000
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Hockin [mailto:thockin@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 22 March 2004 19:43
> To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gmpi] Re: 3.10 (req. 39)
> While I want to see hints attached that say "This is an M/S stream", it
> seems that the complexity is probably not worth it. Those sorts of things
> are probably best left as documentation. If your plugin outputs M/S it
> will have a 2-channel output and your UI or manual will indicate that it
> is M/S.
So your saying that a matrix encoder would need a UI element to select the
input coding and the output coding ? I think I could live with that. Hints
would be nice but not necessary.
So are we happy with 39 and the other parts of 3.10 ? Anyone for moving on
to 3.11 ?
Andy C
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
- Follow-Ups:
- [gmpi] Re: 3.10 (req. 39)
- From: Tim Hockin
Other related posts:
- » [gmpi] 3.10 (req. 39)
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.10 (req. 39)
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.10 (req. 39)
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.10 (req. 39)
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.10 (req. 39)
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.10 (req. 39)
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.10 (req. 39)
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.10 (req. 39)
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.10 (req. 39)
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.10 (req. 39)
- » [gmpi] Re: 3.10 (req. 39)
- [gmpi] Re: 3.10 (req. 39)
- From: Tim Hockin