[glideplan_swproj] Re: [glideplan_swproj] Re: Plugin namespaces

  • From: Tomáš Zámečník <pulcik@xxxxxxxx>
  • To: glideplan_swproj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2012 16:36:20 +0100 (CET)

Hi Kuba,
yes it seems that we have no (or weak) system in namespaces. Feel free to 
create some.
In my opinion, we don't need nested namespaces, but if you wish, do it that way.

T.

> ------------ Původní zpráva ------------
> Od: Cestmir Houska <czestmyr@xxxxxxxxx>
> Předmět: [glideplan_swproj] Re: Plugin namespaces
> Datum: 04.2.2012 12:56:35
> ----------------------------------------
> Good Idea. Maybe Updraft:: would suffice?
>
> Cestmir
>
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 7:57 PM, Kuba Marek <blue.cube@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > currently the namespaces used by plugins are pretty messy.
> > igcviewer uses Updraft::Core, turnpoints use only Updraft ...
> > what about changing it all to Updraft::PluginName ?
> >
> > K
>
> To visit archive or unsubscribe, follow:
> http://www.freelists.org/list/glideplan_swproj
>
>
>

To visit archive or unsubscribe, follow:
http://www.freelists.org/list/glideplan_swproj

Other related posts:

  • » [glideplan_swproj] Re: [glideplan_swproj] Re: Plugin namespaces - Tomáš Zámečník