[ggo-discussion] Re: glGo 1.2 beta
- From: "David C. Oshel" <grikdog@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: ggo-discussion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 12:45:34 -0600
On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 17:36:42 +0100, Peter Strempel wrote:
>The reason why the whole thing is Windows only at the moment simply is,
>the scorer is an external program acquired by Pandanet, and we only have
>the Windows version of it. If I could write such a thing myself, I'd be
>a made man
As far as estimators go, I've seen various algorithms written up in the
A.I. community, such as life or death calculators, etc. It seems as
though a good position evaluator like that would be the heart of a
go-playing computer program.
So how good is the one you have to use? In other words, is it a
parimutuel algorithm trying to fix odds on the outcome, or is it just
counting territory if the game stops now?
Just curious. Sounds like fun to write.
--
David C. Oshel dcoshel@xxxxxxxxx
Cedar Rapids, IA http://www.pobox.com/~dcoshel
``Tension, apprehension and dissension has begun!'' - Duffy Wyg&, in
Alfred Bester's _The_Demolished_Man_
- Follow-Ups:
- [ggo-discussion] Re: glGo 1.2 beta
- From: Peter Strempel
- References:
- [ggo-discussion] glGo 1.2 beta
- From: Peter Strempel
- [ggo-discussion] Re: glGo 1.2 beta
- From: David C. Oshel
- [ggo-discussion] Re: glGo 1.2 beta
- From: Peter Strempel
Other related posts:
- » [ggo-discussion] glGo 1.2 beta
- » [ggo-discussion] Re: glGo 1.2 beta
- » [ggo-discussion] Re: glGo 1.2 beta
- » [ggo-discussion] Re: glGo 1.2 beta
- » [ggo-discussion] Re: glGo 1.2 beta
- » [ggo-discussion] Re: glGo 1.2 beta
- » [ggo-discussion] Re: glGo 1.2 beta
- » [ggo-discussion] Re: glGo 1.2 beta
- » [ggo-discussion] Re: glGo 1.2 beta
- [ggo-discussion] Re: glGo 1.2 beta
- From: Peter Strempel
- [ggo-discussion] glGo 1.2 beta
- From: Peter Strempel
- [ggo-discussion] Re: glGo 1.2 beta
- From: David C. Oshel
- [ggo-discussion] Re: glGo 1.2 beta
- From: Peter Strempel