[ggo-discussion] Re: SGF tree display
- From: Steffen Dettmer <steffen@xxxxxxx>
- To: ggo-discussion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 23:13:58 +0100
* Peter Strempel wrote on Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 22:55 +0100:
> Steffen Dettmer wrote:
> > Just as a probably stupid idea: Maybe in upcoming versions the 3D
> > is a kind of "plugin" for gGo.
>=20
> There is no real good 3D engine for Java.=20
Would get slow I think. That's why JNI or a second application
came in my mind.
> abandoned. Eventually, Sun and SGI announced the development of
> OpenGL integration into Java few months ago, but that might
> will take until end of 2004 or 2005 to be available.
Interesting information. Thank you.
> > some "external drawing engine", e.g. some SDL application
> > which is a standalone server offering some TCP commands?
>=20
> Ugly, ugly. :)
Ugly? mmm... I would see it as a clean client-server application
in the meaning of modern component based designs.
> Communication with shared memory would be possible and
> reasonable fast, but such is only available on Unix.
On linux, local TCP communication is also fast and offers a high
bandwidth. I would not expect any human-detecatable delay.
> I see not much benefit of an external board window application,
> there is a lot of communication going on between the board and
> the core, so it should be IMO in the same process else things
> will be very complex.
I would expect the problems when trying to get the rendering at
the correct place of the screen. however.
> If one wants 3D, why not simply use glGo?
Ohh! Didn't you annouced that development of gGo is discontinued
and superseeded by glGo?
> After all glGo isn't anything else than gGo-in-C++ (well, at
> least it will be when it's done). The huge advantage of gGo and
> Java is its portability to any platform which supports Java
> (especially OS X as I don't have a Mac myself), therefor gGo
> will remain a pure Java application without any platform
> dependant code.
Ahh, even better, CooL :-)
Have a nice weekend!
oki,
Steffen
--=20
Dieses Schreiben wurde maschinell erstellt,
es tr=E4gt daher weder Unterschrift noch Siegel.
- References:
- [ggo-discussion] SGF tree display
- From: Peter Strempel
- [ggo-discussion] Re: SGF tree display
- From: Steffen Dettmer
- [ggo-discussion] Re: SGF tree display
- From: Peter Strempel
Other related posts:
- » [ggo-discussion] SGF tree display
- » [ggo-discussion] Re: SGF tree display
- » [ggo-discussion] Re: SGF tree display
- » [ggo-discussion] Re: SGF tree display
- » [ggo-discussion] Re: SGF tree display
- » [ggo-discussion] Re: SGF tree display
- » [ggo-discussion] Re: SGF tree display
- » [ggo-discussion] Re: SGF tree display
- » [ggo-discussion] Re: SGF tree display
- » [ggo-discussion] Re: SGF tree display
- » [ggo-discussion] Re: SGF tree display
- » [ggo-discussion] Re: SGF tree display
- [ggo-discussion] SGF tree display
- From: Peter Strempel
- [ggo-discussion] Re: SGF tree display
- From: Steffen Dettmer
- [ggo-discussion] Re: SGF tree display
- From: Peter Strempel