[geocentrism] Re: papal infallibility

I had not forgotten him, but I left him out because there is little evidence 
that he supported V2 after his ascention to the throne,  but rather the 
opposite. Allegorically he could have represented Peters attempt at resistance 
in his heart, near the fire, which fear submerged. JP 1 may have been murderd 
when the people surrounding Peter threatened him. 

Keep in mind as you analyse this, my personal approach to time, wherein Jesus 
feels in his passion every single barb of every sin of every man up until today 
and beyond to the consumation of the world. He paid for all sin, and the 
offering by the majority is rejected. 


This is bound up in the doctrine of the eternal sacrifice, the daily sacrifice 
of the mass, wherein the priest by his "magical" words causes God to bring 
Calvary and the cross with Jesus hanging there on into the present time altar 
in every time and every altar, in the hidden unbloody manner called 
transubstantiation. Take careful reading of Daniel. which Jesus specifically 
asked us to do. 

Philip. 
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Robert Bennett 
  To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 10:28 AM
  Subject: [geocentrism] Re: papal infallibility


  Just wondering what John Paul I did in his one month pontificate to incur the 
title of non-pope?

   

  Robert

   

   

  …….., it is entirely possible that the three last popes counting this current 
encumbent, represents the three times denial of Peter. Even though Peter failed 
thrice, Jesus still accepted him as Peter. Hence you are correct. It would be a 
brave man or a fool who takes it upon himself to declare the see vacant, as 
many appear to do.  

   

  Philip

   

   



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition.
  Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 269.5.1/764 - Release Date: 17/04/2007 
4:43 AM

Other related posts: