At 02:32 PM 8/1/2004, you wrote: >On 01 Aug, RM Mentock <mentock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Reply-To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > At 06:55 AM 8/1/2004, Alan Griffin wrote: > > >On 31 Jul, . <yerushabel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > As Moller's text on Relativity makes clear, the centrifugal, > > > > Coriolis and Eulerian forces which are treated as fictitious forces > > > > in a non-geocentric context are real, actual forces in a geocentric > > > > context. > > > > > > No they're not real. They seem to be real if you're in a > > >rotating environment, but they don't actually exist. > > > In general relativity, even gravity is fictitious. > > Thank you. so you're agreeing with me. Definitely not. >Snip all the following about general relativity, which is just a >smoke-screen. Those were relevant quotes from Einstein, Infeld, and Born. > I notice you haven't commented on the "pseudo-scientific mumbo >jumbo" further down the same article! Which article? The two quotes that I included were from books.