[geocentrism] Re: (no subject)

  • From: Alan Griffin <ajg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2004 19:32:15 +0100

On 01 Aug, RM Mentock <mentock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Reply-To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

> At 06:55 AM 8/1/2004, you wrote:
> >On 31 Jul, . <yerushabel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >  As Moller's text on Relativity makes clear, the centrifugal,
> > > Coriolis and Eulerian forces which are treated as fictitious forces
> > > in a non-geocentric context are real, actual forces in a geocentric
> > > context.
> >
> >         No they're not real. They seem to be real if you're in a
> >rotating environment, but they don't actually exist.

> In general relativity, even gravity is fictitious.

        Thank you. so you're agreeing with me.
Snip all the following about general relativity, which is just a
smoke-screen.

        I notice you haven't commented on the "pseudo-scientific mumbo
jumbo" further down the same article!

Alan Griffin



Other related posts: