[geocentrism] Re: (no subject)

1. NO - If the Earth was still and the atmosphere was rotating.
  2. YES - If the Earth was still and the atmosphere was still.
  3. YES - If the Earth was rotating and the atmosphere was rotating.
  4   NO -  If the Earth was rotating and the atmosphere was still.
   
  Bernie
  
Paul Deema <paul_deema@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
          
    Re: Moving Earth Deception
  Neville J, Bernie B
  From Neville Jones Mon Jul 23 18:37:26 2007
  Okay, yes, within certain constraints. And your point?
  From Bernie Brauer Mon Jul 23 18:39:47 2007
  ... then you could say,"Aha I've got you, you threw the ball up and as soon 
as the ball was at it's highest point, all of a sudden a strong wind came along 
and blew it away."
  Neville, thank you -- a simple straight forward answer to a simple straight 
forward question.
  Bernie, have a little faith. I'm not going to pull the rug out from under you 
-- I left childish games behind me long ago. I just want to know whether you 
think that a ball thrown up in still air will return to you hand regardless of 
whether you are moving at constant velocity in a straight line (which probably 
deals with Neville's 'constraints') or if you are standing still.
  The truth is, you've already said so. I'm simply trying to determine whether 
you actually meant what you said. 

  Paul D
  


  
---------------------------------
  Yahoo!7 Mail has just got even bigger and better with unlimited storage on 
all webmail accounts. Find out more.

       
---------------------------------
Park yourself in front of a world of choices in alternative vehicles.
Visit the Yahoo! Auto Green Center.

Other related posts: