# [geocentrism] Re: acceleration calcs attachment

• From: Allen Daves <allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 08:45:31 -0700 (PDT)

```  I'm going here and now to go back and begin in much more detail to address
the error here using Paul?s diagram of an accelerometer and mass....first......
I will ask a question to everyone.....if i am on a planet of one earth mass
that is falling toward the sun will i have any weight and how much will i weigh
and why?.....

lets take a look back at Pauls diagram (attached as  "accelerometer") and ask
one more question....

Is gravity pulling on all parts of the bomb and planet equally and
simultaneously or not?...if it is then why would the scale ever change the
weight it registers? The pressure that the sale had before should be the same
since gravity is pulling on the mass and the bomb and all the parts in the
scale at the same time to the same degrees... If gravity were pulling it all
equally at the same time to the same degree then how and with what force (other
then the force that is pulling everything downward equally to all
parts).....would any of the spacial relationships between the bomb the mass and
the spring be affected if they are all being pulled equally and
simultaneously?...if the spacial relationships were not disturbed then how
could it register a different reading....we only have one force action on our
bomb/mass accelerometer gravity it is the same force before the drop as it was
after the drop, that is to say that gravity is pulling on everything equally to
all parts
simultaneously before and after the drop ..so what is the force is changing
any of the spacial relationships between the mas spring and bomb?......
If gravity is the only force acting on a mass but is supposedly pulling to
all parts of any mass (earth oceans or bomb spring accelerometer) then there
could never ever be any relative motion within that mass to a gravitational
acceleration period.( where would the force be coming from to cause things to
drift from their original spacial positions within that mass?!) You can't be
equal to all parts simultaneously and at the same time cause a change of
relative position of anything within or on that mass being pulled on equally
and simultaneously. If grav is the only force acting on a mass (free fall) and
grav pulling on all parts of that mass and everything on and in it equally and
simultaneously then when you drop it nothing can move relative to each other
and as such there could be no change in the weight of the mass suspended in the
bomb or the weight of a person on that planet of one earth mass falling toward
the sun!
Now look at "slide1" ( attached..this is where the previous diagram erred)
and for the reasons i already gave to philip....Gravity only pulls at the same
rate for all objects it does not pull equally to all parts of anything!..for
crying out loud that is why satilites drift and comets tumble....irregular pull
on a irregular mass
If the scale showed 30 gms before the drop ...then we drop and then the scale
shows 0 grms....that by definition is a change....the cause of that change can
only be shown to be the fact that we were first hanging with no velocity and
then begining to move at a velocity other then what we were hanging
at!!!.....Then demonstrate not just assert what the cause of the change
was......When we had 0 velocity then we have 32 ft per sec per sec going from 0
to 32ft per sec per sec is what caused the change...Your the one imagigning
that the states of weigtlessness and velocity are reversed.!?...

The simple answer to why and how MS could have it all so wrong is that you
guys not only are looking at the conditions all backwards, but you are also
contridicting your own principles of grav in your applications of depending on
the size & or magnitude of your examples............
```