[geocentrism] Yearly Oscillating Helical Orbital Path
- From: Bernie Brauer <bbrauer777@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 09:25:02 -0700 (PDT)
reformatted to adjust/fix horizontal scrolling
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Is my wording in red below correct?
L: Earth is stationary due to perfectly balanced Interactive Electromagnetic
Forces.
R: The sun, fixed within the rotating firmament, spiral-orbits the
Earth north-south and clockwise from the Tropic of Cancer to the Tropic of
Capricorn in six months and then alters course laterally to spiral-orbit
south-north and clockwise for the next six months. Seasons result from the
yearly oscillating helical orbital path of the sun around the untilted/upright
stationary Earth.
Bernie
Bernie,
“Earth is stationary due to pefectly balancedInteractive Electromagnetic
Forces.”
That is one idea…
1. That is one idea but it really misses the fundamental root reason, even in
terms of physics….if you go build a Ferris wheel the foundation is what
everything else rest upon……the fact is that when the physical universe was laid
down the earth is at the physical foundation from where all the rest of the
universe was constructed upon. You see if you build a building it would be
silly to ask why does the foundation not move? It can’t move because the
physical universe is build upon this spot………of course you could destroy the
building by trying to move the foundation…….in-fact Dodwell’s curve
demonstrates a logarithmic sine wave curve of a table top gyroscope…where the
earth is or is at the spot where the point to which the universe is “hinged”
to… it can’t move because it is physically impossible to move the foundation
stone without moving the whole universe.
2. The orbit of the sun is elliptical around the earth it is not a perfect
spiral. This is the point to which I keep trying to make there is absolutely no
reason for a translational orbit except to explain why the earths orbit cannot
be seen from the earth…However as I keep pointing out this would and can only
hold true looking from on earth. The relative motions between the other
positions would not show the same things depending on what the actual motion
is…
Allen Daves
Other related posts:
