[geocentrism] Uranus

Actualy Phil that was a sound and total rebutal of your opinon...but hey "feel" 
whatever you like....

--- On Mon, 1/5/09, Allen Daves <allendaves@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Allen Daves <allendaves@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [geocentrism] Re: Uranus
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Monday, January 5, 2009, 7:50 AM








--- On Sun, 1/4/09, philip madsen <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: philip madsen <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Uranus
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sunday, January 4, 2009, 9:31 PM



#yiv3613151 #yiv1427414891 DIV {
MARGIN:0px;}


That was the whole point of my post to you then and the point of my post 
now...It is a ridiculous imaginative argument to attmept to appeal to every 
atom and molecule ect....Note: I'm not making that argument your and Pauls 
postion does, that is where your and his postions lead 
 
Thanks Allen, for confirming my opinion
 
Philip.

Other related posts: