Paul, I'll play you silly game....Bernie has done such a great job at documenting arguments against a moon rotation around a axis that runs through the moon itself...and..well..I have to be honest…..I’m quite frankly tired of reaping the same things over and over and over and over and over again to someone who is not reading ...or thinking..... or something...?.....I suggest you visit his site listed .......... 1. The diagrams are there and you can find parent "1" that I made reference to shown in Argument #37 2. you ask: "what is the defining difference between the two cases?" I will refer you to my last post to you, it is also listed as argument #48 .... http://sites.google.com/site/earthdeception/moonmovement yes, I think this is far more efficient..since you don’t seem to understand then I suggest you read the whole page,...it is kinda like a "clif's notes" for this Fourm thread.....You may even one day notice or grasp some "common" threads of ideas and arguments portrayed there. You will find no contradiction on my part, simply a willful or otherwise lack of understanding/intrest on your part.... but know that when you actually address those arguments then maybe we will be able to develop even more and new "ingenious" arguments...right now we are just trying to get you to see the issue under consideration period.........We will attempt to wait for you to get caught up .....Good luck Paul, we all counting on you with eager baited breath........... :-D --- On Tue, 12/23/08, Allen Daves <allendaves@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: From: Allen Daves <allendaves@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: Uranus To: Geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Tuesday, December 23, 2008, 7:49 AM Paul, Bernie has done such a great job at documenting arguments against a moon rotation around a axis that runs through the moon itself...and..well..I have to be honest…..I’m quite frankly tired of reaping the same things over and over and over and over and over again to you….....I suggest you visit his site listed at the bottom of this email..... The diagrams are there and you can Find parent "1" that i make reference to shown in Argument #37 you ask: "what is the defining difference between the two cases?" I will refer you to my last post to you, it is listed as argument #48 .... http://sites.google.com/site/earthdeception/moonmovement yes, think this is far more efficient..since you don’t seem to understand then I suggest you read the whole page,...i is kida a "clif's notes" for the Fourm......You may even one day notice or grasp some "common" threads of ideas and arguments portrayed there. There is no contradiction on my part simply a willful or otherwise lack of understanding on your part.... but know that when you actually address those then maybe we will be able to develop even more and new "ingenious" arguments.........we will attempt to wait for you to get caught up ..... --- On Tue, 12/23/08, Paul Deema <paul_deema@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: From: Paul Deema <paul_deema@xxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Uranus To: Geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Tuesday, December 23, 2008, 5:36 AM Allen D In my post earlier today, I intimated that you are saying that the Moon has only one rotation while Uranus has two. I forgot to ask -- what is the defining difference between the two cases? Paul D Stay connected to the people that matter most with a smarter inbox. Take a look.