Phil,,,my diagram called "1force rotational sync"...from my last post specifically deals with your spinning top analogy...you can imagine those motors as spinning tops or spinning tops as motors since something had to cause the tops to spin the principles are identical….....Any force you have in the energized spining top will compleltly prevent the synchronization you are trying to achieve in the spinning tops …..Phil , you absolutely must you reduce in fact eliminate all force and spin motion in the top to achieve sync…...If you have no force, then you have no calim to rotational motion.. particularly since you are invoking force as the cause and reason that you are claiming
there are two motions...Phil, there is only one motion because you had to get rid of..complelty eliminate the spin motion and spin force of th top to achieve that Sync you keep refereing to.....you are going at it backwards here...…you think you are taking the rotation of the tops rotation and put it with the orbit ..You cannot dot that, that is a physical imposibility if insync, those two are mutualy exclusive...….. .I hope you fully appreciate that Phil..you have to and must eliminate any and all additional rotaional force and motion to achieve the spin and orbital rotational sync..the experiment in the diagram proves that....you can have one or the other but not both the spin and orbit at 100 RPM at the same time...that is what i keep trying to get you to see....the experiment proves that what i am saying is true, try it.......look at it you cannot energize the spining top to reach sync, you must deenergize and
eliminate all addtional motion on that axis, you cannot add motion and force to achive your sync you claim....
|