[geocentrism] Re: Two spin axes of Earth?
- From: Regner Trampedach <art@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 15:38:55 +1100
Quoting philip madsen <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Correction accepted... Must be a bad day for me.. I'm usually perfect. I
> always check and check and check again and even when it comes back in the
> mail, I read it again.
>
No worries, Philip.
> I wonder does Allen ever read his own writings once?
>
I'll let him have the benefit of doubt, and assume that he doesn't :-}
Regards,
Regner
> Philip.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Regner Trampedach
> To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Friday, November 16, 2007 10:47 AM
> Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Two spin axes of Earth?
>
>
> Quoting philip madsen <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> >
> > It is not a pity? The position I now accept offers no evidence against
> > Geocentrism. Regner conceded that. It merely means that this avenue has
> > doubtful merit for our side in debunking heliocentrism.
> >
> Slight correction here. I didn't concede, I confirmed.
> Concede implies a reluctance, and I believe I made it clear
> that there was no such reluctance. To quote Philip and myself:
> "Philip: This is no win for HC over GC but,
> Regner: By no means - and I would like to emphasize that."
>
> ...
>
> Regards,
>
> Regner
>
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.33/1132 - Release Date:
> 15/11/2007 9:34 AM
>
>
Other related posts:
