[geocentrism] Re: Two spin axes of Earth?

Regner said,

 "You should not be embarassed - on the contrary.
To be able to change from preconceived notions, when faced with
proof against, is a sign of great and noble minds."

OK hang on !  I had no preconceived notions here. It was more like a confused 
lack of comprehension. And proofs did not enter into the equation. 
Reason did. 

I would like to add that I indeed do not wish the title of a "great and noble 
mind". That is not only embarrassing but shamefull.. It calls on pride, whereas 
I would be humble..   

Lets just call me by my preferred option.... Genius. 

Philip. 




  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Regner Trampedach 
  To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 3:53 PM
  Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Two spin axes of Earth?


  Quoting philip madsen <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

  > This is no win for HC over GC but,
  > 
  By no means - and I would like to emphasize that.
  But now we can hopefully begin on some more deciding discussions.

  > Since Regner caused me to utilize an old word "translation" in a new
  > application, it sure makes these descriptions simpler. 
  > 
  > Sure enough I have awakened this morning with the certain conviction that
  > there is only one rotation, and only one axis of rotation. I am a little
  > embarrassed it took so much unnecessary mental and written wrangling to
  > arrive. 
  > 
  You should not be embarassed - on the contrary.
  To be able to change from preconceived notions, when faced with
  proof against, is a sign of great and noble minds.





  -- 
  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
  Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.32/1131 - Release Date: 14/11/2007 
4:54 PM

Other related posts: