[geocentrism] Re: Two spin axes of Earth?
- From: Regner Trampedach <art@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 02:25:07 +1100
Quoting Jack Lewis <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Dear Regner,
> 1 I didn't call you a liar check my e-mail at the bottom! I inferred that
> you may, unwittingly, be passing on other peoples lies.
>
If you read my reply, you would know that I did read that bottom part, and
that I commented extensively on it. To rephrase it: The nature of science
makes it impossible to "...unwittingly, be passing on other peoples lies."
for more than a short period. Nature doesn't care about our machinations and
doesn't follow "our lies" - she will carry on and do what nature does. And
somebody who is not in on the lie will find out and tell. So either we are
all liars, and you have a conspiracy, or you have some occurences of
short-lived lies - i.e., science cannot be based on lies unless there is a
conspiracy.
You will have to choose which one you believe it is (no reply needed).
> 2 On what do you base your morals? No need to reply - I merely sent this
> because it was an obvious question to raise. Let's stick to geocentrism.
>
Okay - sounds good.
- Regner
> Jack
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Regner Trampedach" <art@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 2:25 AM
> Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Two spin axes of Earth?
>
>
> > Science based on lies will quickly fail and be weeded out.
> > That's where science differ from many other enterprices in life.
> > I am one of those scientists - I have often found, not lies, but poor
> > approximations, in other peoples work - and have sought to improve that.
> > My work is based on what you call lies - and it wouldn't work if it was
> > all lies. So if I say it works, I must also be one of your lying
> > scientists.
> > You cannot call science a lie, and then say that I, one of those
> > scientists,
> > am O.K. and not a liar.
> >
> > And, yes, I do have moral values - I though that obvious from what I
> > wrote.
> > Since it wasn't and I don't have time, I will give your offer a pass.
> > How wonderful to be called a nihilistic liar, now and then.
> >
> > - Regner
> >
> > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>
> > - -
> >
> >
> > Quoting Jack Lewis <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> >
> >> Dear Regner,
> >> I don't call you a liar personally but you may well be passing on other
> >> peoples lies.
>
>
Other related posts:
