[geocentrism] Re: Two spin axes of Earth?
- From: Regner Trampedach <art@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 22:14:38 +1100
So if it doesn't matter to you, what happens out there, why then do
you call astronomers liars - that is quite an accusation, and I do take
it personally too.
Jack Lewis wrote:
"You're born, you exist, you die - end of story. Do you really believe that
Regner?"
Yes, of course. That is why life is so precious, and we should make the best
of what we get - and try to make a positive impact that lasts a bit beyond
our lives. We are leaving this planet to the next generation - that is why it
is important what we do in our lives. Not because of some selfish concerns
about going to heaven or to hell. But that's just my highly immoral, decadent
and materialistic views.
- Regner
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Quoting Jack Lewis <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Dear Regner,
> This is the 'all inclusive' argument for applying one small aspect of
> something to making it into a 'one size fits all'. There is a great deal of
> difference between watching an eagle and looking at something that cannot
> have any bearing whatsoever on the quality of human existence. Seeking
> knowledge purely for knowledge's sake is not, in my view, the best use of
> resources. It may satisfy the curious but it it isn't going to actually
> benefit anyone. We could say the same about this forum and what it stands
> for but again, in my view, this forum's existence has a job to do and that
> is to combat the spread of lies and deceit put out to remove any vestige of
> a human spirit that wants to believe in a purpose to life. You're born, you
> exist, you die - end of story. Do you really believe that Regner?
>
> Jack
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Regner Trampedach" <art@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 9:02 AM
> Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Two spin axes of Earth?
>
> SNIP
> > When you see a black speck high up in a blue summer sky, doesn't it
> > enrich
> > your experience of that little speck, when you then aim your binoculars at
> > it and discover it's an eagle soaring high above you?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Regner Trampedach
> >
> > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>
> > - -
> >
> >
> > Quoting Steven Jones <steven@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> philip madsen wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Not to forget the vast field of Radio
> >> astronomy... much more exciting in some ways even if there are no
> >> hubble like pictures..
> >> Phil
> >>
> >> No, no, no, no!!! Use your eyes! All these big stupid machines of
> >> men overlook the beauty of the creation!!! Radio telescopes are
> >> exceptionally boring.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Steven.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -----
> >> Original Message -----
> >> From:
> >> Paul Deema
> >> To:
> >> geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Sent:
> >> Monday, November 12, 2007 9:59 AM
> >> Subject:
> >> [geocentrism] Re: Two spin axes of Earth?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Neville J
> >> I didn't mention telescopes but I get your point. I also
> >> understand that astronomers today do not sit in freezing conditions,
> >> watering eyes straining at eyepieces and sketching intermittently on a
> >> pad with a pencil held in one of those fingerless glove things.
> >> Paul D
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Neville Jones <njones@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Paul,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> The diffraction limit of "big expensive" telescopes is not achieved in
> >> the real world. Also, no astronomer is "directly examin[ing] the
> >> universe," but rather making observations in a terrestrial laboratory
> >> and seeking to promote and understand those observations within the
> >> currently accepted model.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Neville
> >>
> >>
> >> www.GeocentricUniverse.com
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >>
> >> From: paul_deema@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>
> >> Sent: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 18:17:37 +0000 (GMT)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Jack L
> >>
> >> I doubt one person in a hundred would regard this statement as
> >> patronising. There was an attempt at humour in there -- perhaps that is
> >> what has sparked your ire?
> >> What Regner is doing that only a very small percentage of
> >> the overall population is doing -- is being a professional astronomer.
> >> He gets to use lots of big expensive exciting equipment to directly
> >> examine the universe. I don't know about you but I'm envious.
> >> Paul D
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -----
> >> Original Message ----
> >>
> >> From: Jack Lewis <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Dear Paul,
> >> Why did you find it necessary to patronise Regner in that
> >> way? Regarding the 'real thing' what in heavens name is Regner doing
> >> that no-one else is?
> >>
> >> Jack
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From:
> >> Paul Deema
> >> To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Allen D
> >>
> >> I'd be careful about advising Regner to refer to a model. He doesn't
> >> need one. He plays with the real thing!
> >> Paul D
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Paul D
> >>
> >> National Bingo Night. Play along for the chance to
> >> win $10,000 every week. Download your gamecard now at Yahoo!7 TV.
> >>
> >> No virus found in this incoming message.
> >>
> >> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> >>
> >> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.29/1124 - Release Date:
> >> 11/11/2007 10:12 AM
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
Other related posts:
